And I am just saying that Hagel or Sebellius would not be a good VP fit. Obama already has a large gay problem that does not need further widening. Sebellius is pro-life and upheld Kansas's ban on gay marriage and we all know how Hagel has voted in the past.
Nope.
She's pro-choice, conspicuously so. But thanks for trying.
You should check your facts. She's catholic and prolife.
Wikipedia has her listed as prolife. Thanks for playing!
Whoops, but you shouldn't mention Wiki when you are trying to spin things:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Se belius#Other_issues
"Regarding her position on abortion, Sebelius describes herself as personally pro-life, but opposed to efforts to eliminate or reduce abortions primarily by criminalizing abortion procedures.[28]"
A gutzy position, consider she is in Kansas!
But, of course, you hate her because she supported Obama and not Hillary.
Look, instead of proving yourself to be a dummy by trying to interact with us on something we know, and you don't, why not write some more tasty diaries like the one defending Harriet?
That was comedy gold, stick to that stuff, you'll embarress yourself less.
No she's simply a DINO. Only an Obama supporter would justify such positions but than we know many of you are not serious about gay and lesbian rights or our issues for that matter.Thanks for your spin. You guys are such hyprocrites...
Yeah you folks like Harriet are doing yomans work on Gay and Lesbian issues by supporting the Republic Party.
Cognitive dissonance much? (Look it up if you need to....)
If you are going to be so arrogant at the end of your posts, please make better arguments from the jump and learn how to spell.
Which one of them are you talking to? The hyprocrite or the one doing yoman's work?
