Display:


Re: IMO (none / 0)

You might not agree with this one....Joe Biden.


by soyousay on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 06:45:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: IMO (none / 0)

Actually, if Edwards isn't the pick, I don't really care who it is as long as it's not Hagel or Nunn. My guess is that it will be Clinton or Clark.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 06:47:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Since Hagel is a republican... (none / 0)

...anyone who supports him as VP would be considered a troll on this site...Not IMO though, I'm sick of that sort of thing.


by soyousay on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 06:55:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Since Hagel is a republican... (none / 0)

His name comes up from time to time. I always dismiss it as idle speculation.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 07:21:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Since Hagel is a republican... (2.00 / 1)

I can see (and potentially support) Hagel getting some kind of administration post, but I don't think he's VP material.


I'm as strong as a bull moose, and you can use me to the limit. - Teddy Roosevelt
by fogiv on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 07:32:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Unless (2.00 / 1)

he switches parties.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 10:09:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: IMO (none / 0)

I love Biden, and I'd be thrilled to have him on the ticket.  But I'm also open to the idea that Obama will throw in someone completely unexpected.  To date he's had terrific political instincts and I expect that whomever he chooses will end up providing real balance to the ticket & furthering the campaign.  


A drink whenever Palin makes a Well-argued, Semantically Intact, Logical and Lucid Argument -- or WASILLA for short.
by January 20 on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 07:01:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: IMO (none / 0)

I do, assuming Clark is Secretary of Defense, of course.


by Shaun Appleby on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 07:05:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: IMO (none / 0)

Clark can't be Sec'y of Defense for a few more years.


No Way. No How. No McCain.
by Denny Crane on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 09:34:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You're right... (none / 0)

It's ten from his last active service isn't it?  Sigh.


by Shaun Appleby on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 11:10:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're right... (none / 0)

Wasn't his last active service in 2000?


No Way. No How. No McCain.
by Denny Crane on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 11:13:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're right... (none / 0)

Something like that, well, he'll just have to be VP then, eh?


by Shaun Appleby on Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 11:43:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're right... (none / 0)

No objection from this corner.  I love Wes Clark.


No Way. No How. No McCain.
by Denny Crane on Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 11:24:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]